Male Brazilian Wax Penis Story

Cabaret


D iego Zunino

Memories of high school, when we talked the ancient Romans, there was a peculiarity: the public man should be upright not only in politics but also in the leading private life.

Rome 2009 AD: President of the Lazio Region is forced all'autosospensione because he had sex with transsexuals, and blackmail, was forced to pay first and then to admit publicly. The dark colors do not allow the story to present a clear recognition of the facts. Before him is Sircana criticatissimo to have boarded a viados.

same time a prime minister has been politically persecuted for being allowed to leave revels in his private residence, when the same could have been make a full opposition to many other interventions of the political executive.

A judge who pronounces a verdict against the President that is followed by a camera awkwardly mentions as the odd smoke cigarettes "almost a spot backwards" (only he smokes .... How strange that you have given dear Faber ...) and make turquoise socks and white loafers.

In Paris the head of a minister of the French Republic, Frederic Mitterrand, is sought by the former party colleagues for his uncle's ambiguous denominations in an autobiography and strenuous defense of Roman Polanski and his private vices, but outlaws.

Friends of Action Reform " in Savona, had proposed that a prominent civic formation, where, inspired by the great Montanelli skills are recognized and rewarded on the "This is the list" The Brothel ". Never better name in this period: a cross-border and transnational movement transpartitico well paints the current political situation.

Is this the political debate where each day a private citizen should be subjected? The only yardstick of the public maybe think the figure is in question as "the father of your children?" (Cited above)

I'm not saying it is not important the privacy of a citizen when it assumes a public office: it is a huge responsibility to represent an institution, nevertheless we can not overwhelm the report asking the very personal conduct for acts such as frequent visits under the sheets as a condition of existence of a political mandate.

The reactions were different in primary cases: Silvio cleared everything and everyone, has continued its mandate; good Marrazzo autosuspend embarrassing but was forced to resign. Unfortunately, the least common multiple of these affaires were the prior denial of what happened branded as lies, fibs, etc.. all the material against them, then denied being forced to deny ... sinking embarrassment of the facts. The connivance

also lies in a middle class unable to do against these infamous wall, abused, irritating dossier: economics for dummies invites us to think about the price of goods not asked. This is zero, net of fixed costs. So I'm thinking that if anyone wanted to buy these files, then the "producers" (ie blackmail, a freelance reporter in the smell of easy money) should exit the market, not considering it more profitable to continue this activity in the dubious morality.

I'm not saying this so that activity information is violated, as very little interested in me, so I think to many others, who go to bed with whom. Let alone if this does not alter in any way the balance of a country or territory: who took the view that to ten questions on attending the premier at home was a way of opposition, perhaps the only one able to curb the authoritarian drift has surrendered at the time , which has overshadowed the affair, leaving space for the sardonic jokes available online, on games of words and the end-user sull'escort: in short, a large repertoire of cabaret but not opposition.

I will not give in to the temptation to guess flattering executioner who sees all indictments achieve dell'inquisito blindly to resign, nor do I want to say that the courts rule the country, nevertheless it seems appropriate return to the investigations a certain degree of privacy, "people should know that ..." no, people do not need to know if the person who is in possession of blackmailing me with photos or transvestite is my alter ego disguised in a masterful montage, otherwise is more likely that a great income earner so high in times of crisis it is easier to give in to blackmail rather than entrust the investigation to the Justice.

laugh merrily dancing in this "infernal sardana (cited) poisons, unaware of how to dance in a" court of dwarfs and dancers "(thanks a lot mate for this exquisite Formica motto) to lower myself a lot, and make us feel trifling gentle but frightened, terribly, by a camera around the corner.

As a child I was afraid of doing politics because I was afraid of the Red Brigades, now I'm scared of a case, especially if "5 am".

Phone Service For Asterix

Political commitment: loss of time or Sincere battle of ideas?

Alessio Mazzucco

discussing with a friend on the matter "be actively engaged in politics." He pointed out the futility and dispendiosità time that the task requires not give certainty to reach some goal and implement the ideas of departure, all this despite the disgust in the face of obvious decay of ideals and institutions of our country.

Personally I feel committed. And not just with the newspaper (which lies in the commitment to establish the capability to communicate and discuss their opinions), but in what I call an active policy in a non-partisan group in Milan. This activity will not affect the certain The Coffee , but still a very important weight in my life.

What does engage in politics? Wanting to bring new problems and find solutions where more than they require. Nothing else. The rest is appearance, party, symbol, slogan ol'ala politics of belonging no more which is an artificial construct to simplify the work, to provide a support base or, more often, to give to the poor of ideas can mimic the political world "highly placed".

Politics is beautiful. And I did not need to say for sure Tornatore. And 'nice because it allows the realization of ideas, causes and ideals in the world in which we are immersed. It is not an exercise in style, or rhetoric, it is not ambition or self-satisfaction of a job notorious in Italy for the excesses and vices of gold. E 'irrational push to make a mark, a footprint in the world who entrust to us will happen.

The challenges of our time are many. The choices that we must take will lead us on different roads that once take, can not be changed. One of these choices is to stay active or passive before the passage of time and events, is to criticize sitting inert in a lounge or bold in the midst of the people, and making melody in silence to his belief or be exposed to the ideas and stones those who are good to get them without thinking about the reasons for doing so. Sometimes you just think, develop, reflect and communicate with others because the walls of our society remains a signature, albeit small, of course indelibly in our ideas. I have friends who are around every day to give flyers to publicize their efforts, others who write on their blog, others who, in the evenings most unlikely to give up fun and relaxing to be exits to imagine and develop a better future.

It 's a waste of time? I do not know. Of course, when our time will be spent and our names will be wilted in the collective memory, it will probably often wonder what would have been the youth in our lives if we had made a contribution, however minimal, the gears of history. There are many difficulties, the dangers of too much pain and frustration, but before the unknown and the risk of engaging me to mind the verses of The Song of Roland which state: "Damn the heart that Fell! / At our place we will remain in the field / we are the shock and the battle. "

Ice Skating Ankle Warmers

a signature for Radical Radio

Francesco Salonia

not transmit the latest hit from the Black Eyed Peas are not as cute or Linus Platinette. If you are traveling on Sunday and not being able to follow football, do not count of finding a running commentary.

Sometimes you feel bad, speakers dealing with roughly the microphone when he speaks Pannella then, good luck. But the important thing with him is indeed steal the general sense.

If you want to know what happens in Parliament there are two options: to go there or hear.
If you are interested in events of major political importance of the country, conferences, round tables or simple statements have the same two options: find where the event will take place or listen to.
can be one of those who are activists, that in politics we are in, at every level and see it as a mission, or those that politics, or laziness (like me) or poverty of spirit, as well as lack of opportunity, prefer to follow a more intimate and personal, interpreting it as an exercise of the intellect. No matter which category belong, because Radical Radio makes no difference, no discrimination in the public. His listener can be anyone with a healthy passion for each other national and international policy. Radical Radio ago
Information, Journalism ago, you (because I imagine myself as a woman not so young anymore, but still beautiful and attractive, not as a "thing") disseminate knowledge and if you are also convinced of the profound truth that subject to the cliché that know and power would be inseparable entity, then you will understand well what kind of good this valuable source of information is making a gift to all those who have the good taste of it, for years.
not use capital letters at random, so do information and journalism are two activities that do not need to receive permission from anyone to be carried out. Prohibit or impede the information can only be the unattainable goal of a madman. The information may not be death by a stroke of the sword, as not even a law or a monopoly.
Our major newspapers complain that they have the freedom to inform our fellow citizens and to the streets to claim it. All nonsense, all excuses all deceptions that serve to mask what nobody wants to admit to himself. The information can do, but do not want do. You can obtain information, but you do not have the desire to do so, the intention.
Because the truth is that information makes you sweat, roll up their sleeves and go looking for what interests us, it means to try to listen and to understand it deeply, it means sacrificing long, long time, we could devote to other things, we would like to devote to something else, because after all of us, to be informed, to be so deeply and accurately informed, do not care much.
Information baked hot and wipe under our noses, accurate, complete, easy and accessible, so attractive as to be almost pornographic does not exist. The information is something else and not for people who give up soon. Radical Radio
embodies this spirit. And if she dies, this view so cruel yet so fragrant die with her and there will be only whining, the whining and annoying days on the square.
Visit www.radioradicale.it and also signed the petition that you need to renew the agreement for state funding.

Hemorrhoids And Herpes

The Word Economy

Cristina Greet

The economic and financial crisis has become overwhelmingly space between the lines of the newspaper, capturing the headlines and editorials from overflowing and special sections in which he was confined.

undeniable merit of the crisis in the return to the center of the debate not only political but also the great cultural issues of the economy.

The economy has suddenly attracted great interest, and sold well both among young and among intellectuals, and noting his side of "human science", sensitive to social issues, devoted to the understanding of the primary needs and preferences of the individual man without neglecting at the same time, the aggregate aspect of his actions and the consequences of his choices on the population as a whole.

Suffice it to say that the association "The circle of readers" in Turin this year dedicated an entire series of lectures to the economy, choosing to give a voice in the sphere of "literary salon" to a technical issue that is often considered and sterile.

The cycle began with a meeting entitled "The Market", which was attended by part Bertola Professor, Professor of Public Economics at the University of Turin and staunch supporter of free markets, and other journalist Republic Roberto Petrini, author of "Process economists, that, as you can imagine, has defended a more critical to the market, raising questions and arguing that they are necessary corrective measures and more public to avoid serious crises like the one we are experiencing may be repeated in the future.

In the debate have already emerged, once again the outlines of the "Invisible Hand " Smith, that individuals are driven by selfishness and the maximization of collective well-being can only be achieved through the pursuit of individual self-interest , as opposed to the idea that the market itself is due to their inefficiencies and would simply like more rules and, above all controls, to ensure that appropriate, monopolies and asymmetric information are less stringent.

Not surprisingly, Petrini notes that it was a problem of asymmetric information to trigger the financial crisis of 2007 in all its disruptive.

The most severe effects of the crisis stemmed, in fact, ignorance of the nature of the purchasers of the securities they owned. This will spread throughout the world, in accordance with the principle, this time fatal, risk diversification, "derivatives" that it was impossible not only to declare the goodness, but above all to trace the origin.

should be added that the financial crisis not only highlighted the fragility of the market, but also that of the institutions called upon to protect and which have proved to be wholly inadequate to the task, so as to raise serious doubts about their effectiveness. So for those who favor? It was right to leave all this freedom to the markets would have had to intervene, or more rigorously?

is difficult to reach a final conclusion. Both parties seem to have good reasons, but certainly serious responsibility and certainly the antidote to the crisis has not yet been found.
Strengthen the role of the state or leave the market to fending for myself? Simple lack of common sense or lack of rules, risks inherent in the market or possible but unfortunate coincidences?

These are just some of the questions that remain open economy and new roads are yet fully to discover and follow.

However, I think a clue to those seeking answers is the choice of two Nobel prizes for economics this year 's, Elinor Ostrom, and Oliver Williamson, whose appointment was clearly very significant.

These two economists with strong backgrounds, who have dedicated their studies to demonstrate that not all public goods are managed in an inefficient manner, but sometimes spontaneous forms of cooperation, such as standing with the objective of safeguarding the forest rather than the quality of a given territory, may replace the bureaucracy and even the market itself.

proof that selfishness is not always the guide to human action, demonstrating that do not always need to leave everything to the market.

I think the Academy of Stockholm has decided to launch a call, or perhaps an appeal, since there is still the well-established neo-classical patterns, but they continue to seek new ways to grow and to innovate with courage, Taking note of his own limitations and considering all options, even the most unexpected, without conceit, but with the enthusiasm of those who overcome the "fear" lends itself to cross a new frontier.

Chinese Dwarf Hamster Toys

Gold Man At Goldman, once the name is' A Prophecy

Filip Stefanovic

In the UK there is an ongoing debate which we, here in the province, comes just a few broken murmurs. Subject of the controversy is the announcement that investment bank Goldman Sachs, which is made of raspberries in quarterly net financial crisis turning out a surplus after another - the third and last written to date show a profit of 3 billion / $ ( 2.11 billion €), are expected to grow for the last quarter of this year - will provide its 30,700 employees, and projected data to 31 December, including salaries, bonuses and various benefits, the beauty total of 24 billion / $ (16 billion €). In other words, more than 520,000 € per person, not as evenly distributed: some top traders will share prizes of € 27 million, with 14 others, 7 and so on. If so, it means that in 2009, hopefully with a crisis that is considered already behind but from which it has not really gone out and, in truth, it is very difficult to predict when the U.S. group will cross the threshold record registered in 2007 21 billion / $.

The same Goldman Sachs that less than a year ago received state aid for $ 10 billion, promptly returned in July 2009, with a zeal that many have a little naively read as a demonstration of good will, other, more viciously, in the announcement of the Obama presidency that the groups that have benefited from the support plan Tarp would have roofs of compensation for managers and executives set by the state. In short, as he said Giulio Andreotti, "to think the worst is a sin, but we often guesses."

In my view, figures of this size push an interested reader to ask themselves, in reverse, a fundamental question: What is Goldman Sachs? Twenty-four billion dollars is maybe too much to defuse the question with a simple "bank."

GS is basically a financial holding company, hours supervised by the Federal Reserve, which draws most of profits from operations on every kind of financial market, betting on the future value of disparate assets: commodities, interest rates, equities , indices, currencies, in the far west where the cowboys of the most famous are nice as nails that (Bear Stearns, Merrill Lynch, Lehman Brothers), and where was the last gringo, Goldman Sachs, in fact, is now master (or almost) the entire prairie. However, if, however, our gunman is the only one capable of hitting the target, which will have the steadiest hand in the west or the target is to materialize where he shoots? Said it best: If Goldman Sachs operates in markets uncertain and invisible, illegible betting on the future values \u200b\u200bex ante, then where everything is played on the quantity, quality and reliability of the information and those who create this information, as well as the behavior of other participants ( the dead and sickly), but weigh the same analysis on the results of the partners of Goldman? The question is, in short, if you are not faced with the classic autorealizzanti prophecies, and how much space is therefore still given more to the risk that the real chance. Sure is that the bank always wins, if we consider the fact that the various fees accounted for 50% of net revenues. As the saying long on the scale and urgency of values \u200b\u200bthat guide our choices of good traders, certainly everlasting love of profit maximization, the Taliban are hiding behind the neoclassical dogma ever proved the perfect rationality of the market, and why not, the merchants. The clamor raised by those gambling has never been attracted, and therefore remains immune to the charm of the green table of the bag, unless the scandal of awards millionaires rose perhaps a bit 'too much, we tried to run for cover promising that Goldman may donate more than a billion dollars to charity, the classic dish of lentils to soak up the bulk of the cake without poisonous glances out the window.

In short, ethics and finance that do not go hand in hand I do not think a recent discovery or just shared, the real problem to solve is to understand whether this is correct and above all, now more than ever, safe for future developments global economy, or if there is a need for stricter controls and regulations and sought, without raising the specter of a feared statist spectrum. Any necessary adjustment will markedly, however, be adopted worldwide, it is the imposition of caps on commissions and fees, or the ratio of total assets between debt and equity capital. The effort would otherwise be not only vain and counterproductive but difficult to achieve. A subject that would be interesting to bring to the table of the G20 and see if it's too pretentious to believe they can change something with the same rapidity with which it is able to respond to the crisis in the autumn of last year. Anyone who still believes against all historical evidence, or do it again, perfect in the gears of a market to watch, I just wish for an unforgettable concert orchestra and decent, while the Titanic runs into the next iceberg.

How To Make Animated Cat Ears

Cristina Greet

The 09/09/2009 went on television images of a rose that changes color from black, clears and turns white. This is the symbol that the media had chosen for the day of "violence to women", launching the invitation to all women to wear something white. I think a day dedicated to this subject at present have a deep meaning and sadly is an important occasion to warn women to remind everyone how far should still be to achieve full gender equality.

I know that the general perception is that the problem has long since passed and resolved, yet it is
a few weeks ago the story of Hussein, the Sudanese journalist risked 40 lashes for having committed a serious crime to wear trousers in public places.
little attention was given to his courageous refusal to pay the fine imposed by agreeing to serve one month in prison, while not bending the law who had suffered discrimination.

But let me worry is not so much news coming from the Middle East, where it is known that the battle for the emancipation of women is still to be played. Via a process of 'changing every day goes against the literal interpretation of religion and power consolidation. Alarming signals from the same Western world from "home". Sometimes obvious differences in pay, bullying, stalking ; are subliminal and sometimes we even realize it.

If you take a picture of the Italian Parliament we can easily realize the difficulty for a woman to make his entry into politics, than it was thought to be "man".

An example is the United States, and precision, the heart of the most democratic and tolerant of the U.S., the Democratic Party. Over the last primaries have faced, in one of the most combative and compelling electoral competitions, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. Both samples of two slices of the population in different ways have experienced discrimination in the past, and certainly much smaller extent, still live in the present.

During the campaign, none of the Republicans chose to pull the racism in the game as a strength in his contest against Barack Obhama, and the challenge took place at the political level, the ideas and values, even if, as in any country that respects itself, gossip and low blows are not missed and fair play has remained a mirage.

Racism is no longer accepted in the United States and, of course, a joke about the candidate's skin color would raise scandal, embarrassment, and, above all, did lose several percentage points in polls. No one would permission, no one even dreamed it would, unless it had been determined to commit one of the most serious strategic mistakes as possible.

same can not be said of the campaign against Hillary, based instead on attacks sexist and vulgar, who represented it as the home of the White House, fragile woman commander in chief of the army. A concept unacceptable to people who make the weapons its flag of freedom.

This makes me think.
Perhaps most progress has been made in the fight against racism than for gender equality.
Certainly there is still much to do.
But the achievements in other fields of human rights, such as combating racism, that President Obama embodies to perfection, and the passion and force with which Hillary Clinton led the battle makes me think, to hope that much progress will be made in the coming years.