D iego Zunino
Memories of high school, when we talked the ancient Romans, there was a peculiarity: the public man should be upright not only in politics but also in the leading private life. Rome 2009 AD: President of the Lazio Region is forced all'autosospensione because he had sex with transsexuals, and blackmail, was forced to pay first and then to admit publicly. The dark colors do not allow the story to present a clear recognition of the facts. Before him is Sircana criticatissimo to have boarded a viados.
same time a prime minister has been politically persecuted for being allowed to leave revels in his private residence, when the same could have been make a full opposition to many other interventions of the political executive.
A judge who pronounces a verdict against the President that is followed by a camera awkwardly mentions as the odd smoke cigarettes "almost a spot backwards" (only he smokes .... How strange that you have given dear Faber ...) and make turquoise socks and white loafers.
In Paris the head of a minister of the French Republic, Frederic Mitterrand, is sought by the former party colleagues for his uncle's ambiguous denominations in an autobiography and strenuous defense of Roman Polanski and his private vices, but outlaws.
Friends of Action Reform " in Savona, had proposed that a prominent civic formation, where, inspired by the great Montanelli skills are recognized and rewarded on the "This is the list" The Brothel ". Never better name in this period: a cross-border and transnational movement transpartitico well paints the current political situation.
Is this the political debate where each day a private citizen should be subjected? The only yardstick of the public maybe think the figure is in question as "the father of your children?" (Cited above)
I'm not saying it is not important the privacy of a citizen when it assumes a public office: it is a huge responsibility to represent an institution, nevertheless we can not overwhelm the report asking the very personal conduct for acts such as frequent visits under the sheets as a condition of existence of a political mandate.
The reactions were different in primary cases: Silvio cleared everything and everyone, has continued its mandate; good Marrazzo autosuspend embarrassing but was forced to resign. Unfortunately, the least common multiple of these affaires were the prior denial of what happened branded as lies, fibs, etc.. all the material against them, then denied being forced to deny ... sinking embarrassment of the facts. The connivance
also lies in a middle class unable to do against these infamous wall, abused, irritating dossier: economics for dummies invites us to think about the price of goods not asked. This is zero, net of fixed costs. So I'm thinking that if anyone wanted to buy these files, then the "producers" (ie blackmail, a freelance reporter in the smell of easy money) should exit the market, not considering it more profitable to continue this activity in the dubious morality.
I'm not saying this so that activity information is violated, as very little interested in me, so I think to many others, who go to bed with whom. Let alone if this does not alter in any way the balance of a country or territory: who took the view that to ten questions on attending the premier at home was a way of opposition, perhaps the only one able to curb the authoritarian drift has surrendered at the time , which has overshadowed the affair, leaving space for the sardonic jokes available online, on games of words and the end-user sull'escort: in short, a large repertoire of cabaret but not opposition.
I will not give in to the temptation to guess flattering executioner who sees all indictments achieve dell'inquisito blindly to resign, nor do I want to say that the courts rule the country, nevertheless it seems appropriate return to the investigations a certain degree of privacy, "people should know that ..." no, people do not need to know if the person who is in possession of blackmailing me with photos or transvestite is my alter ego disguised in a masterful montage, otherwise is more likely that a great income earner so high in times of crisis it is easier to give in to blackmail rather than entrust the investigation to the Justice.
laugh merrily dancing in this "infernal sardana (cited) poisons, unaware of how to dance in a" court of dwarfs and dancers "(thanks a lot mate for this exquisite Formica motto) to lower myself a lot, and make us feel trifling gentle but frightened, terribly, by a camera around the corner.
As a child I was afraid of doing politics because I was afraid of the Red Brigades, now I'm scared of a case, especially if "5 am".
same time a prime minister has been politically persecuted for being allowed to leave revels in his private residence, when the same could have been make a full opposition to many other interventions of the political executive.
A judge who pronounces a verdict against the President that is followed by a camera awkwardly mentions as the odd smoke cigarettes "almost a spot backwards" (only he smokes .... How strange that you have given dear Faber ...) and make turquoise socks and white loafers.
In Paris the head of a minister of the French Republic, Frederic Mitterrand, is sought by the former party colleagues for his uncle's ambiguous denominations in an autobiography and strenuous defense of Roman Polanski and his private vices, but outlaws.
Friends of Action Reform " in Savona, had proposed that a prominent civic formation, where, inspired by the great Montanelli skills are recognized and rewarded on the "This is the list" The Brothel ". Never better name in this period: a cross-border and transnational movement transpartitico well paints the current political situation.
Is this the political debate where each day a private citizen should be subjected? The only yardstick of the public maybe think the figure is in question as "the father of your children?" (Cited above)
I'm not saying it is not important the privacy of a citizen when it assumes a public office: it is a huge responsibility to represent an institution, nevertheless we can not overwhelm the report asking the very personal conduct for acts such as frequent visits under the sheets as a condition of existence of a political mandate.
The reactions were different in primary cases: Silvio cleared everything and everyone, has continued its mandate; good Marrazzo autosuspend embarrassing but was forced to resign. Unfortunately, the least common multiple of these affaires were the prior denial of what happened branded as lies, fibs, etc.. all the material against them, then denied being forced to deny ... sinking embarrassment of the facts. The connivance
also lies in a middle class unable to do against these infamous wall, abused, irritating dossier: economics for dummies invites us to think about the price of goods not asked. This is zero, net of fixed costs. So I'm thinking that if anyone wanted to buy these files, then the "producers" (ie blackmail, a freelance reporter in the smell of easy money) should exit the market, not considering it more profitable to continue this activity in the dubious morality.
I'm not saying this so that activity information is violated, as very little interested in me, so I think to many others, who go to bed with whom. Let alone if this does not alter in any way the balance of a country or territory: who took the view that to ten questions on attending the premier at home was a way of opposition, perhaps the only one able to curb the authoritarian drift has surrendered at the time , which has overshadowed the affair, leaving space for the sardonic jokes available online, on games of words and the end-user sull'escort: in short, a large repertoire of cabaret but not opposition.
I will not give in to the temptation to guess flattering executioner who sees all indictments achieve dell'inquisito blindly to resign, nor do I want to say that the courts rule the country, nevertheless it seems appropriate return to the investigations a certain degree of privacy, "people should know that ..." no, people do not need to know if the person who is in possession of blackmailing me with photos or transvestite is my alter ego disguised in a masterful montage, otherwise is more likely that a great income earner so high in times of crisis it is easier to give in to blackmail rather than entrust the investigation to the Justice.
laugh merrily dancing in this "infernal sardana (cited) poisons, unaware of how to dance in a" court of dwarfs and dancers "(thanks a lot mate for this exquisite Formica motto) to lower myself a lot, and make us feel trifling gentle but frightened, terribly, by a camera around the corner.
As a child I was afraid of doing politics because I was afraid of the Red Brigades, now I'm scared of a case, especially if "5 am".
